Friday, March 30, 2012

Justice for Trayvon Martin


Trayvon Martin was a seventeen year old African American male who was shot and killed by a Caucasian (some say Hispanic) neighborhood watchman, George Zimmerman. I am not here today to speak on the injustice of this situation, which has been all over the news and todays media. I chose to look at what methods both Zimmerman and Martin’s family took for society to see their respective sides as innocent.
I was first introduced to this story about two weeks ago, almost a month after the shooting. When I read what those who were “fighting for justice” had to say about Martin, I could not help but side with his family. On their Facebook page, Justice for Trayvon Martin, the supporters were sure to use images of Trayvon which made him seem as an innocent child. The picture which is the face of Justice for Trayvon shows a young boy who looks no older than fifteen when he was reported to be killed at seventeen. The biography makes sure to emphasize the good that Martin has done and his immense innocence. This does not mention the fact that Martin was suspended for having drug paraphernalia more recently.
George Zimmerman, on the other hand, has been repeatedly attempting to make himself look innocent and remorseful of the situation while old news from his past continue to arise. Originally he was reported as a white male which his family later began to argue that he was Hispanic (trying to pull the race card there?) Now he is identified as a half-Hispanic male who reportedly was fired from a security job for being too aggressive.
But do these old facts make this a black and white situation? In cases like these we always tend to look at a person’s past as if that will somehow explain everything that caused this death. Martin having drug paraphernalia does not mean that he was a vicious drug user that was out to rob houses that night when Zimmerman caught him and was attacked. And Zimmerman having “problems” at work (a statement that was not given by reputable sources) does not mean he can bring himself kill an innocent child. I personally do not know what happened that night and I hope that justice is served on this case but I cannot forget that every man is innocent until proven guilty. 

Friday, March 16, 2012

Semi-visible Children?

  Over our (ridiculously short) spring break a YouTube video was released. But not just any video, this short documentary initiated a conversation that should have been happening for years now. If you do not know by now the video I am referring to is the Invisible Children’s 29 minute documentary on a man named Joseph Kony. If you do not know who he is here is my super-duper watered down version of it. So the International Criminal Court named the worst criminals of the world and Joseph Kony is at the top of that list for conducting a civil war in Uganda for about 26 years with the Lord’s Resistance Army. Even though the LRA is no longer in Uganda, this army continues to kidnap, mutilate, rape and kill families in Central Africa. Invisible Children, the group that created this video believes that if we as a society make Joseph Kony famous then congress will continue to support the US troops who are in that area helping armies with intelligence to capture Kony.
But that is not what I wanted to talk about to. I wanted to bring up how society reacted to this video and why. This KONY 2012 video received close to 80 million—MILLION views in about a week. Our generation definitely did what they had to do to make Kony famous. But why? This has been going on for 26 years and now is when people take the stand to say something about it? To make this situation even worse the majority of the people who are making the tweets and comments do not even take the time to get a well-rounded view of the situation. Rather they watch this one video and assume they know everything. After researching the topic, I learned that there was a lot left out like the fact that the LRA is no longer in Uganda and that the people of Uganda do not even want to be seen in this light. But the majority of this generation will not even learn more on a topic that they are so verbal about on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr etc. What I want to know is what does this say about our society if so many people can only learn about the world around them by someone else forcing it into their faces on social networks? Are we becoming a society that just keeps the blinders on and only focuses on our backyard?

Here's the video if you would like to watch :)